Destructuring consistency fixes (#1417)
- Use AST_Destructuring for lhf assignment patterns - Use AST_DefaultAssign for default assignments - Add more checks for lhs expressions - Add lots of testing - Cleanup ast (e.g. remove default property) - Fix #1402 based on a patch from @kzc - Refine spread allowance in array destructring pattern - Add destructuring AST tree checker
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Alex Lam S.L
parent
85c1cba760
commit
07734b000a
@@ -47,64 +47,83 @@ describe("Function", function() {
|
||||
assert.equal(destruct3.is_array, false);
|
||||
assert.equal(destruct4.is_array, true);
|
||||
|
||||
var aAndB = [
|
||||
['SymbolFunarg', 'a'],
|
||||
['SymbolFunarg', 'b']
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
// destruct 1
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
destruct1.names[0].TYPE,
|
||||
destruct1.names[0].name
|
||||
destruct1.names[0].key,
|
||||
destruct1.names[0].value.name
|
||||
],
|
||||
aAndB[0]);
|
||||
['ObjectKeyVal', 'a', 'a']
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
destruct1.names[1].TYPE,
|
||||
destruct1.names[1].name
|
||||
destruct1.names[1].key,
|
||||
destruct1.names[1].value.name
|
||||
],
|
||||
aAndB[1]);
|
||||
['ObjectKeyVal', 'b', 'b']
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// destruct 2
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
destruct2.names[0].TYPE,
|
||||
destruct2.names[0].name
|
||||
],
|
||||
aAndB[0]);
|
||||
['SymbolFunarg', 'a']
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
destruct2.names[1].names[0].TYPE,
|
||||
destruct2.names[1].names[0].name
|
||||
],
|
||||
aAndB[1]);
|
||||
['SymbolFunarg', 'b']
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// destruct 3
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(typeof destruct3.names[0].key, "string");
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(destruct3.names[0].key, "a");
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(destruct3.names[0].value.TYPE, "SymbolFunarg");
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(destruct3.names[0].value.name, "a");
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(typeof destruct3.names[1].key, "string");
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(destruct3.names[1].key, "b");
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(destruct3.names[1].value.TYPE, "SymbolFunarg");
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(destruct3.names[1].value.name, "b");
|
||||
|
||||
// destruct 4
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
destruct4.names[0].TYPE,
|
||||
destruct4.names[0].name
|
||||
],
|
||||
aAndB[0]);
|
||||
['SymbolFunarg', 'a']
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(destruct4.names[1].TYPE, "Destructuring");
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
destruct4.names[1].names[0].TYPE,
|
||||
destruct4.names[1].names[0].name
|
||||
],
|
||||
aAndB[1]);
|
||||
['SymbolFunarg', 'b']
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
get_args(destr_fun1.args_as_names()),
|
||||
aAndB);
|
||||
[['SymbolFunarg', 'a'], ['SymbolFunarg', 'b']]
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
get_args(destr_fun2.args_as_names()),
|
||||
aAndB);
|
||||
[['SymbolFunarg', 'a'], ['SymbolFunarg', 'b']]
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
get_args(destr_fun3.args_as_names()),
|
||||
aAndB);
|
||||
[['SymbolFunarg', 'a'], ['SymbolFunarg', 'b']]
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||||
get_args(destr_fun4.args_as_names()),
|
||||
aAndB);
|
||||
[['SymbolFunarg', 'a'], ['SymbolFunarg', 'b']]
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Making sure we don't accidentally accept things which
|
||||
// Aren't argument destructurings
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user